Library & files

Lossless

Lossless means the encoding discards nothing: decode the file and the original samples come back bit for bit. WAV, AIFF, FLAC and ALAC are lossless; MP3 and AAC are not.

Measured in real DJ libraries

Lossless is 16.7% of a real DJ library, and it splits three ways — no one format has won the argument.

AIFF, FLAC and WAV sit within a couple of points of each other in real collections, which tells you the choice gets made by what a DJ’s software and players read without complaining rather than on the merits. Buy lossless and convert down when you need to: you cannot get back what a lossy encoder threw away.

16.7%

Of a real library

6.6%

AIFF

5.2%

FLAC

4.9%

WAV

Updated daily from Rekordbox collections DJs have imported to Mixgraph. Method: what lossy encoding costs.

Why it matters

The argument for lossless is not mainly about what you can hear on the night. It is that a lossless file is a master you can generate anything from — a stick copy, a different format, a stem separation, a remaster — while a lossy file is already a decision somebody else made and cannot be undone.

It matters more the more you process. Time-stretching, key shifting and stem separation all magnify encoding artefacts, so the file you feed into that work should be the best one you have rather than the smallest.

Frequently asked

Can you hear the difference between lossless and 320 kbps?+

Rarely, and less often than the argument suggests. The reason to keep lossless is that it survives conversion and processing intact, not that a floor will notice.

Which formats are lossless?+

WAV and AIFF uncompressed, FLAC and ALAC compressed. All four return the original samples exactly; the compressed pair just take less space doing it.

Should DJs buy lossless?+

If you convert, process or archive, yes — it is the version everything else can be generated from. If you buy a track, put it on a stick and play it, 320 kbps is genuinely fine.

Related terms