Library & files

WAV and AIFF

WAV and AIFF are uncompressed audio containers — the raw samples, no encoding. They sound identical to each other and differ mainly in how they store tags and which software wrote them.

In practice

WAV and AIFF are the same audio in different wrappers — pick the one your software tags reliably.

If your library already tags cleanly, this is not a decision worth making. If it does not, the fix is usually to move to whichever container your software writes tags into properly and re-import, rather than to fight the tagging. Either way, uncompressed files are large enough that most DJs end up keeping them as masters and carrying something smaller to the gig.

1,411 kbps

CD-rate stereo, either format

None

Audible difference between them

Tags

The only real difference

Where these come from: Format properties and the arithmetic of CD-rate stereo (44.1 kHz × 16 bits × 2 channels), not catalog figures. For what we can measure, see the same audio, smaller.

Why it matters

The practical difference is metadata, not audio. AIFF has carried tags reliably for longer, WAV support has historically been patchier across software, and a DJ library lives or dies on whether the artist, title and key survive a move between programs.

The audio difference is nothing, which is worth saying plainly because a lot of energy goes into the question. Both hold the same samples at the same rate; a conversion between them is lossless in both directions.

Frequently asked

Does AIFF sound better than WAV?+

No. Both are uncompressed containers holding identical samples, and converting between them changes nothing about the audio.

Which should DJs use, WAV or AIFF?+

Whichever your software tags reliably. Metadata that survives a library move matters far more than a container choice that has no effect on sound.

How big is an uncompressed track?+

At CD rate, about 61.4 MB for a track of median length in this catalog — roughly four and a half times a 320 kbps file of the same track.

Related terms