Key & harmony

Open key vs Camelot

Open Key and Camelot are two competing relabellings of the same twenty-four keys, both arranged so that neighbouring numbers are compatible. They differ only in where the numbering starts and whether it uses d/m or A/B.

Measured in real DJ libraries

Camelot notation appears on 74.5% of tracks in real DJ libraries. Open Key appears on 0.21%.

This is not a close contest and it is not really about the notations. Camelot is what the software defaults to, what the wheel on every chart is drawn as, and what another DJ will recognise if they look at your screen. Open Key is a defensible design that lost. Unless you have a specific reason, use the one your gear, your charts and the person taking over from you already read.

74.5%

Camelot

0.21%

Open Key

24

Keys either way

Updated daily from Rekordbox collections DJs have imported to Mixgraph. Method: the notation itself.

Why it matters

Because they encode the same relationships, neither is musically better and the entire question is which one your gear, your library and the people around you already use. A notation nobody else reads is a private system, and DJing is not always a private activity.

That makes this the rare comparison with a measurable answer rather than a preference. One of the two is what real prepared libraries actually contain, and the gap is not close.

Frequently asked

Is Open Key better than Camelot?+

Musically they are equivalent — the same twenty-four keys, arranged so neighbours are compatible. The difference is adoption, and Camelot has almost all of it.

How do I convert between Open Key and Camelot?+

They map one to one, so any conversion tool or chart handles it. The important part is converting your whole library rather than ending up with both in one field.

Why does Open Key exist at all?+

It was designed to be more intuitive, starting its numbering somewhere more musically natural. It is a reasonable design that arrived after the alternative had already been adopted.

Related terms